
LLM QA Reviewer / AI Output Validator (RAG Systems)
- or -
Post a project like this€1.8k(approx. $2.0k)
- Posted:
- Proposals: 19
- Remote
- #4496776
- Expired
AI & ML & Deep Learning Expert, Large Language Model(LLM), Deep Learning, Researcher
Website Developer | Mobile App Developer | Website Designer | Ai Developer | Software Engineer

Expert Web Developer - N8N, Wordpress, Shopify, Opencart, Laravel, Vue, React, PHP

1074983012844907127114713656654117216885668717131432789851580857951760165101349279713321619
Description
Experience Level: Expert
Description
We are building a small network of specialists focused on AI reliability and LLM validation.
At ProoflineAI, we work with companies deploying AI assistants and RAG-based knowledge systems. Our goal is to ensure these systems are accurate, grounded, and production-ready.
This role is focused on evaluating AI outputs—not building models.
What You’ll Do
You will help assess and improve AI system reliability by:
• Reviewing LLM responses for factual accuracy
• Detecting hallucinations and fabricated references
• Verifying grounding against source documents
• Identifying retrieval vs generation failures in RAG systems
• Scoring responses using structured evaluation criteria
• Creating test prompts and edge cases
• Documenting failure patterns clearly
Ideal Profile
You may be a strong fit if you have experience in:
• AI QA / AI annotation
• NLP or LLM evaluation
• QA testing / data quality
• ML Ops / AI operations
• Reviewing AI-generated content critically
Strong written English and attention to detail are essential.
Location (Preferred)
We are primarily looking to work with candidates based in:
Poland
Romania
Portugal
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Compensation
Depending on workload:
• €800 – €1,200/month (part-time)
• €1,200 – €1,800/month (full-time)
Long-term collaboration possible based on performance.
MorganBaronRec ..
0% (0)Projects Completed
-
Freelancers worked with
-
Projects awarded
0%
Last project
25 Jul 2026
United Kingdom
New Proposal
Login to your account and send a proposal now to get this project.
Log inClarification Board Ask a Question
-

Hi MorganBaronRec, before discussing evaluation workflows I’d like to understand whether your current reliability process is mainly human-reviewed qualitative analysis or if you already have structured benchmark datasets, scoring rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines in place? Also, when identifying RAG failures, are reviewers expected only to classify retrieval vs generation issues, or also help improve prompt strategy, chunking logic, citation behavior, and grounding methodology based on observed failure patterns?
THanks
Naresh
1155210
We collect cookies to enable the proper functioning and security of our website, and to enhance your experience. By clicking on 'Accept All Cookies', you consent to the use of these cookies. You can change your 'Cookies Settings' at any time. For more information, please read ourCookie Policy
Cookie Settings
Accept All Cookies