Insights
Insights
- by Wayne R.
- Posted: 27 Mar 2014
- by Ed M.
- Posted: 21 Mar 2014
- by Daniel M.
- Posted: 21 Mar 2014
- by Andrew L.
- Posted: 19 Sep 2013
-
No result found
- by 123 1.
- Posted: 14 Sep 2013
-
123 1.
Birmingham, GBHis work was excellent. Although he didnt view the job descrition correctly. The bid was for 6 pieces of work. Not 4 and a 30 second video script. He blackmailed us to pay for full bid or he will take legal action. We now have 4 websites talking about our business as a fraudster.
Steven John D.
All work was carried out to the satisfaction of the client, including several pieces of external work. As soon as all work was received the client refused to pay. PPH ruled that the contract was fulfilled, on my part, and the client was effectively attempting to 'steal' work. Additionally, the services offered by the clients company are non-existent (they even list themselves as their own clients on the website) - does this make them fraudsters? Probably, but that isn't for me to decide. I would, however, warn against anybody contacting Ian or any business he is associated with for work. PPH found in my favour this time, others may not be so lucky.
- by James T.
- Posted: 14 Sep 2013
- by Glen G.
- Posted: 6 Sep 2013
-
No result found
- by Novaflare F.
- Posted: 6 Sep 2013
- by Janos G.
- Posted: 28 Aug 2013
- by Matthew W.
- Posted: 22 Aug 2013