Write 2 letters
- or -
Post a project like this2687
£15(approx. $19)
- Posted:
- Proposals: 7
- Remote
- #1379465
- Awarded
SEO, Web development Health and Medicine, Legal Writer, Ebook writing, Social Media Marketing, Content Writer, Artist, Fashion, Editor, Graphic, Web designer, Academic writer
Yala
135176132480314132301419384144497914463491315724
Description
Experience Level: Intermediate
Kind of letter: Legal
Topic: Letter threatening legal action + reply
Tone: Formal/Professional
Outline & Structure: So, I need to write 2 short legal letters. Actually, it's more about perfect english writing rather than law. (However, you still need to use phrases and vocabulary appropriate to this kind of letters as seen in the examples).
-In general, you just need to rewrite the facts according to the examples given and use them correctly.
The first one is a threatening legal action letter and is supposed to be longer than the reply (as shown on an the example #1 attached), and the 2nd one is a reply to the letter #1. (see example #2 attached).
Both letters should be based on a fictional situation described bellow:
-
Scenario 8
PLAINTIFF - HELPFUL PASSERBY
The driver of a car negligently hits a parked truck and then flees the scene of the accident. The driver of the truck is seriously injured and unable to exit his vehicle, which is leaking fuel as a result of the accident. A passerby stops to help the injured truck driver, at which point the truck explodes and badly injures the passerby as well as the truck driver. The passerby (Plaintiff) sues the driver of the car (Defendant) for causing the truck to explode and injure him, even though he could have avoided injury if he hadn’t stopped to help.
-
And here's a predictable result of the case:
Plaintiff wins. In most states, when a person negligently creates a circumstance that cause injury to a victim, the negligent person is liable not only for the harm caused to the victim, but also the harm caused to any person injured in an effort to rescue the victim.
-
This information might be helpful:
Elements of Negligence:
a. Duty: The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care. The duty of care owed is determined by a reasonable person standard. A reasonable person would consider: (1) the burden of taking precautions; (2) the likelihood of harm; and (3) the seriousness of the harm that might be caused.
b. Breach: The defendant’s conduct violated that duty (the defendant did not act reasonably)
c. Causation: The defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s harm:
i. Cause in fact = actual cause.
ii. Proximate cause = harm was foreseeable.
d. Damages: The plaintiff suffered actual damages
i. Tort law is concerned with restoring the plaintiff to his or her position, had the injury not occurred.
I need this task back by Sunday.
Extra notes:
Topic: Letter threatening legal action + reply
Tone: Formal/Professional
Outline & Structure: So, I need to write 2 short legal letters. Actually, it's more about perfect english writing rather than law. (However, you still need to use phrases and vocabulary appropriate to this kind of letters as seen in the examples).
-In general, you just need to rewrite the facts according to the examples given and use them correctly.
The first one is a threatening legal action letter and is supposed to be longer than the reply (as shown on an the example #1 attached), and the 2nd one is a reply to the letter #1. (see example #2 attached).
Both letters should be based on a fictional situation described bellow:
-
Scenario 8
PLAINTIFF - HELPFUL PASSERBY
The driver of a car negligently hits a parked truck and then flees the scene of the accident. The driver of the truck is seriously injured and unable to exit his vehicle, which is leaking fuel as a result of the accident. A passerby stops to help the injured truck driver, at which point the truck explodes and badly injures the passerby as well as the truck driver. The passerby (Plaintiff) sues the driver of the car (Defendant) for causing the truck to explode and injure him, even though he could have avoided injury if he hadn’t stopped to help.
-
And here's a predictable result of the case:
Plaintiff wins. In most states, when a person negligently creates a circumstance that cause injury to a victim, the negligent person is liable not only for the harm caused to the victim, but also the harm caused to any person injured in an effort to rescue the victim.
-
This information might be helpful:
Elements of Negligence:
a. Duty: The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care. The duty of care owed is determined by a reasonable person standard. A reasonable person would consider: (1) the burden of taking precautions; (2) the likelihood of harm; and (3) the seriousness of the harm that might be caused.
b. Breach: The defendant’s conduct violated that duty (the defendant did not act reasonably)
c. Causation: The defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s harm:
i. Cause in fact = actual cause.
ii. Proximate cause = harm was foreseeable.
d. Damages: The plaintiff suffered actual damages
i. Tort law is concerned with restoring the plaintiff to his or her position, had the injury not occurred.
I need this task back by Sunday.
Extra notes:
Ivan I.
100% (15)Projects Completed
10
Freelancers worked with
8
Projects awarded
13%
Last project
13 Dec 2017
Russian Federation
New Proposal
Login to your account and send a proposal now to get this project.
Log inClarification Board Ask a Question
-
There are no clarification messages.
We collect cookies to enable the proper functioning and security of our website, and to enhance your experience. By clicking on 'Accept All Cookies', you consent to the use of these cookies. You can change your 'Cookies Settings' at any time. For more information, please read ourCookie Policy
Cookie Settings
Accept All Cookies