Quality at PeoplePerHour is going upwards!

Hello everyone,

Having carefully read your comments on the Upcoming changes to CERT blog post, today we would like to give you an update based on some fair points made back then. Specifically, we would like to announce that soon we are rolling out a new feature to enhance quality in the PeoplePerHour marketplace.

How it works:
When Sellers have received low ratings for their recently delivered work, they will be getting a warning email and if in the next reviews they fail to increase their average feedback rating over a minimum quality standard, then their selling privileges on PeoplePerHour will be suspended.

Important notes: This evaluation process is complementary to the CERT ranking which continues to apply. Also it will take into account sufficient amount of recent work.

Benefits for Buyers:
– The quality of the PeoplePerHour freelance community is kept at a very high level, as new talented Sellers join and the ones with poor reviews cannot sell anymore.
– Sellers are more careful when committing to doing a task, knowing that they have to deliver high quality work consistently.

Benefits for Sellers:
– This feature builds a foundation of trust, as Buyers looking for top freelancers will know that Qualified PPH Sellers are guaranteed to deliver work of a high standard.
– Opportunistic Sellers are detected early and taken out of the marketplace thus ensuring that competition is more fair.

Next steps would be to adjust the CERT criteria so that more Sellers are ranked in the top CERT levels compared to today’s distribution. The CERT system is currently too strict and lets only a small percentage above level 3 which is unfair bearing in mind that quality of services delivered gets better and better over time.

We would like to hear from you about these changes – as always – in the comment box below.

Avatar
Dimitris Koufakis
PeoplePerHour
Stay inspired. Keep growing.
Get insights and tips sent straight to your inbox.
Got something to say?
Share your story and become a guest author on the PeoplePerHour blog.
Share your story

Comments

avatar

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Andrew Jones
Andrew Jones

This is really a RUBBISH update – Already many buyers leave a bad feedback even after recieving quality work – This will completely undermine the value of sellers and above all provide them no breathing space at all.

I would say please THINK AGAIN – before rolling out something like that .

Faryad
Faryad

Generally speaking, the rating system makes sellers slaves of the buyers. Some buyers misuse this system. They ask for extra work out of the job scope. Some threaten refunds and bad ratings because they simply don’t know what they want. And some buyers intentionally leave bad feedback, even tough they are completely satisfied with the delivered job. As a seller who always delivers HQ work and extraordinary products even beyond expectation, I’m not satisfied with the feedback system and PPH is strongly holding the buyer’s side in this regard. Even in some obvious cases where someone leaves a negative feedback,… Read more »

Ashish
Ashish

Completely agree with Faryad!! This is another nail in the coffin for Sellers. The rating system has already been a loose point for sellers. Buyers use this to their advantage and give negative feedback even after working and delivering the work completely as per their specs and within the deadlines. Recently i encountered such an incident when my buyer threatened me against a negative feedback. I worked for almost a month and still received a negative feedback in return. What all i did is ‘i asked him to pay the invoice for the work done’. Did i do anything wrong?… Read more »

Andrew Jones
Andrew Jones

I completely agree with FARYAD – The buyers are already getting fantastic quality at a very low rate. Moreover, they put extensive pressure on the sellers for extra work or else face the consequences with bad feedback – So I do believe that this is certainly not the way forward for PPH. Otherwise, PPH is indeed going to loose its skillful pool of sellers.

Garry Wood
Garry Wood

I am afraid I completely agree with the above posts. This could possibly put a massive strain on sellers to dance to the tune of whatever the buyer wants… wether it was in the original job spec or not. If you drive all of the quality providers away from PPH you will not have a quality product. even worse for the PPH business model would be sellers seeking to be paid outside to pph to negate the chances of of poor feedback affecting their abilities to gather future work. Also as I believe has been mentioned before different tasks take… Read more »

Ashish
Ashish

Rightly said Garry!!

CERT is not good for long term projects.

There needs to be some concrete way for awarding the ratings. Endorsements is one such option but that can also be forged so that can’t be the only way of doing it.

There must be some manual check that ensures that feedback not entirely be the buyer’s will and the seller’s attention towards the project must be taken in to account in some way.

Soubhik
Soubhik

PPH seems to be losing its way. Yes, the CERT system is faulty but you cannot suspend one’s account for 1-2 negative feedbacks. Buyers will get whimsical and honestly, quality freelancers would be leaving PPH if anything.

Kenneth
Kenneth

I completely agree with the above posts – I give all my buyers brilliant quality at a fair rate. I have worked hard delivered the work and I either don’t get the Buyer paying or they hold me to ransom for more work and when I say NO!, they slap me with bad review. I don’t believe that this is the best way forward for PPH.

Ashish
Ashish

TOP100?? Are you serious? I am among the TOP100 and i really feel it’s highly unfair for others.

System must be for all and not for just a few selected people. What’s the point signing up 600,000 people if you want to benefit only the TOP100?

O.
O.

You had & continue to have so many bad ideas that I think I’ll start searching for better work markets. All the pressure is on freelancers, all the fees also paid by freelancers, buyers are presumed to be well-intended. And what do you do to regulate the situation? You put some more pressure on freelancers.
Wow, you’re surely transforming PPH into a slave market. Freelancers beware!

Arnab Wahid
Arnab Wahid

Someone in your company read a book on gamification and instead of actually improving you company has turned it into a rigged game of poker which can only be enjoyed by people who flunked at high school math.

Have PPH thought about expanding it’s ventures to mineral mining in Africa? Plenty of people there ready to slave away! Instead of harassing location independent workers PPH should seriously consider it!

SilentRaven
SilentRaven

Agree with the comments above. In no way does this new system protect the Sellers (who incase forgotten actually bring in the revenue to PPH). This is getting to a point where Buyers can hold a Seller to ransom over the work commissed. Scope creep is all too common with Buyers often having a ‘do it or I will leave bad feedback’ attitude. And this system is just going to perpetuate this. And do not get me started on long term projects. Feedback may not always be current as projects can span weeks, if not months. This is a real… Read more »

mohamed
mohamed

this is very very bad update I have good feedback here on PPH ,but I’m caring also with the other sellers as there is clients wanted a huge works for just 10-20$ so many buyers search for the cheap prices so PPH should collect both poor quality providers and good quality providers and the buyer who choose the seller based on his previous feedback another point, if all sellers here are top ones and all taking 100% , it will raise the proposal amounts so clients will escape from pph and also can make the clients not trusting pph site… Read more »

mat
mat

I also think the Top 10 is a bit tight in a marketplace of 600,000. Top 100 would be better.

Honey
Honey

It is all well and good adjusting the CERT and tweaking things to improve the mechanics of this strategy. However, it still does not address the problem of FAKE identities and FALSE locations certain existing and new members create for themselves in their profiles. A prime example being that one NEW member who managed to set themselves up 2 FAKE IDs in 2 FALSE locations managed to achieve a CERT 4 before he was stopped and made to admit she was in fact a “HE” and not based in the UK but in Karachi!! He has been allowed to keep… Read more »

Dave
Dave

Hi,

Got to agree with what most are saying. I love good feedback, but just ONE bad feedback drops your rating like a stone already! Surely that is enough of a punishment?

Plus the cert is badly broken. Just one example. This seller sells one hourlie a week max in a year, only has 94% rating on feedback yet never drops from level 5 cert? If I dont put 10 jobs through a week, my level drops a lot on my dashboard?

Sumil M
Sumil M

Wow! I am totally agree with Faryad and other fellows who are agree with him.

Think of a PPH without SELLERS and only BUYERS. Buyers can blackmail sellers and can make them do extra work without paying for the said work by saying he will rate him bad and write bad review… no not done!

If you want to run this site successfully, think of both sides and do not only favor buyers because they’re paying. Without a SELLER there is no BUYER… as simple as that.

Sue Edwards
Sue Edwards

Agree with comments above. PPH currently already has its share of projects with micro budgets and massive expectations.

Allowing, as is proposed, a very subjective rating with no avenue for redress is a slippery slope. If you want good sellers running proper businesses to serve those who seek help then become more evenhanded and protect the sellers.

I have become very much more selective over whose bids I accept and often will speak with them first before proceeding with any work on this platform due to the one sided nature of the dispute process.

Matt Campbell
Matt Campbell

I think the CERT rating should be stricter. I had no problem getting to CERT 5 and was even in the top 20 for a few weeks when I was turning over a lot of work. I’ve hired people with CERT4 rating and the same person failed to deliver twice and forced me to refund my client which dropped my CERT rating to CERT4 temporarily. Sellers need stricter regulations, there’s too many sellers out there who think or take a chance on being able to complete the work only to fail. A couple of my best clients have come from… Read more »

Chris
Chris

OHHHH PPH!!! Seriously why do you keep doing this, I don’t know who comes up with these ideas but id suggest you find someone else!! STOP TRYING TO FIX WHAT ISNT BROKEN!!! You have to think to yourselves what’s to stop rival sellers purchasing hourlies and leaving a couple bad feedbacks to get a competitor suspended to increase their chances of sales? Also why is CERT unfair? We have worked hard to get a higher ranking/CERT? We had to work our asses off and now just like that the doors get opened for everyone to join us in a high… Read more »

Andrew
Andrew

I’ll just mention 2 things I believe are important.

1.) If a 2nd negative rating is left, it must come from a completely different buyer or seller. 2 from the same buyer or seller resulting in suspension is wrong.

2.) Implement the SAME rules for buyers and sellers. If sellers are to be held to a strict standard so should the buyers.

To concerned sellers, do yourself a favor and never rely on one platform for income. Spread your work opportunities out, just in case you hit a bad string of buyers and are suspended. It will likely happen to many.

Andy
Andy

I have 30 years experience in software design and development, plus 15 years experience in business analysis, requirements gathering, and business document production.

I was just about to sign up to PPH, but this blog post and the entirely reasonable comments that follow has made me think twice.

This does not seem like a fair market place now.

Aurel Garceava
Aurel Garceava

“When everything is working something is wrong”. I don’t understand why there are updates like that and there aren’t updates like a photo cover on profile page, changing backgrounds or something like that and there are updates “guys, will be bad”…… “guys, if you made money until now, it was luck”…. “guys, why to be everything normal, when you cannot work anymore?”…. Jesus!!!!!

Pippa
Pippa

I am a buyer and a seller, so coming at it from both points of view, I just wanted to throw into the mix that wouldn’t it be fairer if we had an equal system for both? Everything seems to be directed at stamping down on sellers (yes, you get some bad sellers) but you also get some bad buyers. Obviously we can’t have a CERT system for buyers (although possibly a ‘this is a good buyer’ badge?) but I think it’s very doable to hold the buyer’s to the same feedback standards as you do the sellers. My particular… Read more »

Patrick
Patrick

I am a strict Buyer. I agree with the sellers on this one. Do no make the transaction process so difficult that the sellers have to break their back’s to over compensate for a buyer. The prices given here are already super cheap for the quality given. Don’t make them sell their soul for $50.

Alfy
Alfy

First of All I agree with a lot of the comments posted here. The update is seriously flawed and must be stopped immediately! It is based on the assumption that only 100% feedback is good enough. How much negative feedback is bad feedback? and how far will my rating need to drop before I get kicked out of PPH? 90% 45%. If i was a buyer and all I saw on a PPH were sellers with 100% feedback i would be convinced the system is rigged and would run for my life! Why are you building a system which only… Read more »

Allison McCafferty
Allison McCafferty

So yet again buyers are king and sellers are second class citizens. Protect your sellers or you will lose them.

Chris
Chris

Here is a thought why don’t you actually ask us what we want as sellers and buyers instead of thinking up ideas that simply don’t work or benefit anyone?

Kev Barton
Kev Barton

It would probably help if the automatic 15 feedback was not left when a project is cancelled.

Several times I have not had the required amount of input to start let alone complete a project and they were then cancelled which resulted in me receiving a 1/5 feedback automatically

vasu naman
vasu naman

Hi, I know you guys are trying to do some good in this, but providing ranks or removing a seller from a system on the basis of some bad reviews can be bit unfair sometime. and if you want to improve quality Just add few tests in the system, so that if a seller who pass the test he/she only will be able to provide services on this platform. It will also help you to find quality freelancers in the beginning instead of the current way in which you will be able to find opportunist seller after a long time.… Read more »

Afsheen
Afsheen

Couldn’t agree more with all of the comments here…as a matter of fact my experience with PPH had been pretty good and moderators had worked in my favour in removing 2-3 unfair feedback, however I do have serious problems with how PPH hugely favours buyers, specifically when a ‘then’ ‘happy’ buyer receives consistent drafts of the work and appreciates my work during the project course. However as soon as the work is received (and only very few buyers have done that to me) buyer comes up with list of issues which seemingly PPH moderator wouldn’t really understand because a. they… Read more »

Afsheen
Afsheen

Another thought….
Rather than empowering buyers with such stringent measures and hugely biased too, why doesn’t PPH try to educate and raise awareness amongst buyers that ‘if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys’…
Perhaps this strategy would automatically filter out not-so-skilled sellers, hence PPH resources could be better optimised.

rachael
rachael

so when poor workers get banned they just set up another account, liking themselves and reviewing each other to boost them up?

rachael
rachael

what was wrong with the old way before CERT?

Honey
Honey

To Rachael,

Very well said:

“so when poor workers get banned they just set up another account, liking themselves and reviewing each other to boost them up?”

Couldn’t agree more!

Stephen
Stephen

I think sellers have said everything I could at this point. I wanted to raise the fact that this is fundamentally a poor business decision for PPH. You take 15% of our income as a revenue source for PPH. If someone has been receiving enough regular work to have high ratings, and receive some bad reviews, before being suspended, you’ve just cut your own revenue stream for PPH. On top of that, sellers trying to make their buyers happy by reducing costs and allowing scope creep, will reduce the amount each seller earns. Again, reducing the revenue stream for PPH.… Read more »

Sumil M
Sumil M

Very well said and I agree with that 101%.

Omar
Omar

Since I joined PPH, I am just hearing bad news for Sellers. What s going on here. Penalty for Delay Hourlie, degrade of the badge and now suspension! If the buyers are paying, Sellers are also giving back services from their times, experience and knowledge. It is win to win situation. There are already many things going against Seller. There are no hours tracked for the amount of time. No push for the Buyer to pay when the job done. Whatever situation is, humans make mistakes and errors regardless of education and experience. I just hope the best for all.… Read more »

Kayleigh
Kayleigh

Completely agree with the above posts. What a terrible idea. I have one 3 star and one 4 star rating on my profile (all the others are 5 stars) and the 3 was from a customer who wasn’t complaining as work was completed on time and to a high standard. He only rated my down because I quoted him for future work and he wasn’t happy with the quote he couldn’t afford! SO sick of PPH and it’s increasing fees and ridiculous rules! You know like the one about not being able to follow up on a proposal…they seriously need… Read more »

Paper Planes
Paper Planes

WT?????? This is rubbish. many buyer dont bother to give rating. few buyer praise your work but at the time of rating they leave with 3 or 4 stars. We are already annoyed of this. and now this issue raise.
Sellers must protest against this

Amanthi
Amanthi

This is bad features. because still have very big chances for Buyers and some time buyers leaving bad reviews after getting quality work. i have few experience about. I think this one also hard to new sellers. Think before this

Zahid
Zahid

To some extend I second Stephen apprehensions! To minimize the current of fear among sellers, I do suggest the buyer’s own rating should be first given due weightage for his/her poor rating to any seller?

The ratings of higher integrity and weightage buyers only should be considered for issuing warning email to seller, though!

Jonathan
Jonathan

I do not have any negative feedback but I entirely agree with earlier comments. Buyers do exploit the website and seek to getting more for their money after a reduced fee has been agreed. I am already very disappointed that my profile says I respond “within a few days”. If I wish to revert to my earlier response status of one day or similar, I have to log in everyday! In this day and age, one can keep an eye on their account by checking email alerts, which is what I do. I only log in when a potential job… Read more »

Amelia Champion
Amelia Champion

If work quantity is involved in ratings, does that mean that we cannot take time off as we will be punished? No more holidays…?

Jade
Jade

yet again anouther update that works negatively in the sellers favour and positively in the buyers why are’nt buyers being held up to the same standards. what realy erks me is the fact that i had a high level 4 cert which has recently masively droped despite finishing sevral jobs on time and with a happy client sevral of who didnt leave feed back at all its highly fustrating that when i dont get feedback for jobs that have been complted i still get droped in cert how is this my fault. I realy think this anouther bad update abd… Read more »

Benjamin
Benjamin

I agree with most of the comments above. The PPH system in general, and feedback in particular, is heavily weighted in favour of buyers. There really need to be more protection for sellers. Some buyers use the implicit and unstated threat of bad feedback to coerce sellers into doing more work than has been fairly paid for. If you are going to implement strict systems like this, at least give your customer service agents more discretion to remove unfair feedback. If negative feedback (for otherwise good work) has been left out of spite, retaliation, or punishment, then customer services should… Read more »

Lucian
Lucian

I think both sellers and buyers should be considered equals.So even if I dont have any low rated job, I agree with the comments above.I belive you should focus on 2 major aspects: keep a buyer interested of the hq services here on PPH,and also help a seller to grow and maintain his rating position as fair as possible.Of course if someone is on cert 4 and he has not any activity in 2 months,probably the cert should be a little bit lower.BUT if there isn’t someone to post a job on music services for a month for instance,why my… Read more »

Roy Thompson
Roy Thompson

Why are you so anti sellers?

CJ Andrew
CJ Andrew

LOL. Honestly? Really? I could help adding my 2 cents. Forgive the air quotes. There are plenty of them in my comment. First of all, Christos appears to indicate that this update is going forward, so I’m not sure if our comments here have any bearing on PPH’s business decision. Personally, I feel like PPH is changing direction. I think the platform is seeking to move toward a more agile service delivery agency approach. Hence the creation of “Tasker”, which directly competes with PPH freelancers, and which I believe will eventually subsume PPH. Part of this change in direction is… Read more »

Dawn Benson
Dawn Benson

I am getting really fed up with PPH attitude towards freelancers (sorry I am not using the term sellers). Maybe there are some bad freelancers but quite frankly there are some very bad buyers. Some of my buyers have been excellent but others have been demanding, unreasonable and dreadful at communication. I am sure other freelancers have experiencing unreasonable buyers and we have to put up with it in case we receive bad feedback. Frankly the budgets for most of the project are ridiculous and if people are not willing to pay the going rate for skilled work then they… Read more »

Aamir
Aamir

i think you have to give some authority to sellers as well 🙁

Tops
Tops

My would say the majority of people that are only here to buy would agree with this update in any business if you supply a poor service or quality of work why should you be rewarded with another contract to do the same how ever if pph are going to suspend accounts then they should have a system in place where they can quality control the work because of buyers purposely giving bad feed back and if it’s found the job was done well the buyer should be banned

Lola
Lola

sorry mates if this system will be launched no seller will be work here due to this system most of buyers doing just fraud after they got the work they just refused if this happened then no one will work again on this site

Yuriy Ratush
Yuriy Ratush

I agree with Dawn Benson.

Burhan Safi
Burhan Safi

I do 100% Agree with Faryad !!!

Actually i have faced such situations recently.

the client Ordered my hourlie and didnt even gave me the proper instructions , stopped replying for a week. He came back and asked for his hourlie which i did according TO HIS SO CALLED INSTRUCTION and he left a negative feedback..

And the rest i had issues was the buyer ordering the hourlie and not replying for days and even weeks.

They would only come up to reply once a week.

So i totally disagree with this new system.

it will take most of freelancers to move to another platform.

Lee Croxon
Lee Croxon

HI there, Yes agreed with the majority here. I had a client who wanted some Mac works done and it involved a site vosost as the client wanted. I went and then the job was agreed done. So Buyer paid on PPH before I left the clients site. Sounds fair doesn’t it. But wait what happens next is typical. The client then wants more work done under the original completed job. Phoning at really odd hours of the evening and I advised him of normal business hours but after making my case to him the buyer left negative feedback. I… Read more »

Colin Morley
Colin Morley

Buyers wanting something for nothing and seldom responding to questions or bids. Work categories badly sorted (I translate French to English, and am always getting requests to bid English to French which I don’t do..) All geared toward huge profits with very poor treatment of sellers. Please do something constructive for a change!

Suzanne
Suzanne

What I would really like to see is more input being invited from us freelancers, and our opinions and experience given weight. I feel sometimes that we’re perceived as nothing more than drones toiling away; and that we must be up to no good because otherwise why put even more pressure on us and threaten us with even more sanctions.. We’re creative people, who work best when we’re not being asked to dance like bears to win favour.. How about PPH tackles some of the appalling jobs being posted on PPH. Instead of taking all comers, set standards for buyers.… Read more »

Suzanne
Suzanne

Oh – when I say “share the fees with us” I mean that buyers and freelancers could both pay a fee. However, it would be lower on both sides, because both sides are paying something and not just the freelancers who lose out most when the fees are low.

Suzie Tall
Suzie Tall

It was not very profitable before, but with the one job that I actually got paid for giving me a good rating I thought I would be fine – but my hourly has disappeared and it looks like I am now an outcast having spent weeks submitting proposals for unfunded projects that I got no remuneration for. I can’t even update my profile because it has a mandatory requirement of choosing up to three key skills from a list that has nothing in it related to what I do!

Rahul Parashar
Rahul Parashar

First trending hourlie to demote all their top seller hourlies to 10th page Now they want take away the CERT score of all Top Sellers for few mean bad buyer who blackmail top sellers to ruin their rating if they do not work in their unjust request and try to expliot them. I have severed over 160+ clients in last 20 months and have got at least 20 clients who tried to threaten me and I have even refunded thousands of dollors and waiting my hundreds of hours working for bad clients. PPH is very harsh on their sellers and… Read more »

MVS
MVS

I totally agree that PPH is turning into a slave market.

The other day I purchased hardware for a customer and the customer called off the project mid-way and pph made me give a full refund to the client. I now have the hardware on my head and a hole in my pocket for $ 1200. PPH always only considers the clients side and freelancers are treated as servants who just have to follow orders that the PPH customer services boss gives.

I am soon going to look for another website who atleast respects the freelancers hard work…

Vijay
Vijay

You guys already have review system and that itself should be enough for the buyer to select the one have good reviews and successful track record here in PPH, Now I don’t think PPH should interfere anymore…

Once we get any negative review we have to anyway pay that back by finding the next project as its difficult when the buyer see’s a negative review and decide not to select…

Its going to be a really tough for any seller work in this way, I will have to look for other market now

Thanks for being so kind for sellers, Rubbish

Christos
Christos

thank you all for your comments. Just to add that the purpose of this feature is not to ban Sellers that get a few bad reviews. Banning a user will happen rarely like we ban Buyer accounts and Seller accounts now. A ban will be taking place only if there is enough data to suggest that the Seller is never going to keep up with the minimum quality standards our Sellers provide nowadays. Apart from this you raise some good points here mentioning difficult problems for which we will to try to find solutions as always. Our Sellers are equally… Read more »

Joe Pritchard
Joe Pritchard

Unfortunately most online market places seem to give undue weight to the needs of buyers – take a look at ebay, for example.

I work hard to develop good ongoing relationships with regular repeat buyers where possible – if I got downgraded and bounced off of PPH by unwarranted bad reviews I’m pretty sure my ‘regulars’ would find me somehow…

PLEASE try and find a fair balance – start vetting some of the jobs posted, to start with.

Honey
Honey

And PLEASE get rid of all the bogus identities that are appearing on the scene!

Mark M
Mark M

In the UK the minimum wage is £6.50 (USD10.00) per hour. Why then are buyers permitted to ask freelancers to do work for much less than this? I am posting less and less bids/proposals on PPH, simply for this fact.

If a buyer wants their jobs to be done to a high standard then they have to expect to pay for that high quality service. Like the saying goes, “You get what you pay for!”

Stephen
Stephen

A compromise and fairer solution to an improvement in quality might be to withhold publishing feedback until both the buyer and seller have left some.

I notice that there can be a tit-for-tat approach to feedback on PPH, and some buyers do not leave feedback at all. Not publishing the feedback until both parties have left, encourages those involved to give feedback and create it based on their experience.

Maybe others will disagree with this, please explain if you do – it just seems like a fairer way to use the feedback system.

MVS
MVS

I think you are right Stephen and they should also block the feedback box after 3 weeks or so that the buyer cannot come back after a month and blackmail the seller with a negative feedback.. if he doesnt solve some bugs on the buyers website.. which might have arisen out of the buyers fault..

If no feedback is left by the buyer within certain days the feedback option should be disabled for that workstream… It should not remain open forever..

Honey
Honey

Agree with Stephen – much fairer approach to feedback!

freeman
freeman

Hi folks
This new system will affect the “reputation” if the client left no feedback?
I hope not….
Thanks in advance for any response, it’s my first time here.
Btw the new cert system is just unfair and stressful.
Just my opinion don’t be mad at me please.

Symon Blomfield
Symon Blomfield

I have a 100% 5 star rating however I know I will never make TOP SELLER. Why? Because having once asked my clients in major companies to endorse me they were immediately spammed. Second problem you have is zero quality control. PPH should have PROS and WANNABEES and clearly give clients a choice to pay a proper minimum rate or take their chances. If they choose the latter they deserve everything they get. I do not understand as you take a percentage why you are perpetuating a drive to the bottom,

adam s
adam s

The ridiculous calculations for so calle quality is based more on output and fast money into PPH cokmission than anything else. It does not take into account lengthy time projects like legal work or court cases. PPH is also increasingly forcing the rates to dirt level by allowing a swarm of unqualified, non insured sellers joining, as theyve discovered a way of fooling buyers with cheap rates for jobs. Absolutely shocking! even struck off ex solicitors who served 2 years in prison for mega fraud, brazenly masquerade on this site. When you report scammers, PPH simply do not care. Buyers… Read more »

Kelly
Kelly

Hi Adam,

I’m very sorry to hear of your experiences with PPH and we really do appreciate and value your opinion and feedback. Please email us at support@peopleperhour.com to talk through your issues with a member of our team.

Thanks so much.

Oguz Ozkan
Oguz Ozkan

I made complaint for a poor quality and unfinished work but nothing has been done about it. As a person who used people per hour few times I would advice you to check the qualification of the seller before ordering an hourlie as most sellers at people per hour are lacking qualification. People Per Hour needs to check this but they don’t and when you want help they don’t care about you. Fraud is wide spread in People Per Hour!

Kelly
Kelly

Hi Oguz, I’m so sorry about that. Please click here and then scroll down and click ‘Contact Us’ to talk to our support team about this: https://support.peopleperhour.com/hc/en-us/ I hope they are able to resolve your issue. Please let me know if I can help you with anything else.

Find an expert for anything

Work with curated freelance talent from all over the world.
Manage the entire project within PeoplePerHour.
Pay securely with confidence.
No upfront payments, no hidden fees.